ICCnotes

Inherited Cardiac Conditions reference

Open this condition in the interactive app →

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)

Quick Summary

Definition: A primary myocardial disease characterised by left ventricular hypertrophy not solely explained by abnormal loading conditions.[1]

  • Prevalence: 1 in 500 (most common inherited heart condition)[1]
  • Key genes: MYBPC3, MYH7 (together ~60% of genotyped cases), TNNT2 (some variants arrhythmia-prone)
  • Hallmark: Asymmetric LVH (≥15mm) without loading condition
  • High-risk markers: NSVT, unexplained syncope, massive LVH (≥30mm), family history SCD
  • First-line Mx: Beta-blockers (avoid vasodilators), ICD if high-risk, consider mavacamten if obstructive

Aetiology

Monogenic (Mendelian): ~40–60%, pathogenic sarcomeric variant (e.g. MYH7, MYBPC3)[1]

Acquired: not a cause of true HCM; exclude hypertensive/athletic LVH and infiltrative phenocopies (amyloidosis, Fabry)

Complex (likely polygenic): ~40–60% genotype-negative, increasingly attributed to a polygenic background[1]

Genetics

Inheritance: Autosomal dominant with age-related, often incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity; reported penetrance estimates vary substantially with variant class, ascertainment and cohort

Genetic yield: ~60% diagnostic rate with genetic testing[1]

Major genes (sarcomeric):

GeneProtein% HCMPenetranceNotes
MYH7β-myosin heavy chain25–35%>95% by age 50Early onset; severe hypertrophy common
MYBPC3Myosin-binding protein C25–35%~65% by age 50Late-onset, often attenuated phenotype; one of the two commonest HCM genes
TNNT2Cardiac troponin T~5%VariableSome variants associated with increased arrhythmic risk despite relatively mild hypertrophy
TNNI3Cardiac troponin I~5%40–90%Variable severity
TPM1, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1Various sarcomeric<5% combinedVariableRare; variable phenotype

Gene-level penetrance and phenotype figures derive largely from referral cohorts and vary widely with variant class, ascertainment and family screening; treat them as indicative rather than fixed.

Pathophysiology: Sarcomeric protein mutations → myofibrillar disarray, increased myocardial stiffness, diastolic dysfunction, myocardial ischemia (microvascular dysfunction), and arrhythmogenic substrate

Phenocopies to exclude: Amyloidosis, Anderson-Fabry disease, mitochondrial disorders

Prevalence

1 in 500 individuals in the general population[1]

Most common genetic cardiovascular disease

An important cause of sudden cardiac death in young people and athletes (the reported proportion varies by registry and population)

Diagnostic Criteria

2023 ESC Diagnostic Criteria

Adults (≥18 years):

  • LV wall thickness ≥15 mm in ≥1 myocardial segment (echo, CMR, CT)
  • Wall thickness NOT explained solely by loading conditions

With family history of HCM:

  • LV wall thickness ≥13 mm in ≥1 segment

Children and adolescents (<18 years):

  • LV wall thickness >2 standard deviations above predicted mean (z-score >2)

Diagnosis

Clinical Presentation:

  • Often asymptomatic, diagnosed on family screening or incidental finding
  • Dyspnea on exertion (most common symptom)
  • Angina (even with normal coronaries due to microvascular dysfunction)
  • Palpitations, presyncope, syncope
  • Sudden cardiac death (may be first presentation)

Physical Examination:

  • Systolic ejection murmur at left sternal edge (if LVOT obstruction present)
  • Murmur increases with Valsalva, standing (decreased preload)
  • Double apical impulse, prominent 'a' wave on JVP

ECG Findings (>90% abnormal):

  • LV hypertrophy criteria
  • Deep T-wave inversion (especially lateral and inferior leads)
  • Pathological Q waves
  • Atrial fibrillation

Investigations

First-line:

  • 12-lead ECG
  • Transthoracic echocardiography (measure wall thickness, SAM, LVOTO gradient)
  • Ambulatory ECG monitoring (24-48 hours)
  • Exercise stress test (symptom assessment, LVOTO, BP response, arrhythmias)

Advanced imaging:

  • Cardiac MRI - LV mass, late gadolinium enhancement (fibrosis), apical aneurysm

Genetic testing:

  • Recommended in all patients with confirmed HCM
  • Enables cascade family screening

Treatments

Medical therapy for symptoms/LVOTO:

  • Beta-blockers (first-line, ESC 2023 Class I[1]):
    • Bisoprolol: start 2.5mg od → titrate to 5–10mg od
    • Metoprolol succinate: start 25mg od → titrate to 100–200mg od
    • Atenolol: 25mg od → 50–100mg od (less preferred; caution in renal impairment)
    • Titrate to symptom relief and resting HR 55–65 bpm; avoid vasodilating beta-blockers (carvedilol, nebivolol)
  • Verapamil (if beta-blockers contraindicated or not tolerated, ESC 2023 Class IIa[1]):
    • Start 40mg tds → titrate to 80–120mg tds (max 480mg/day)
    • Never combine with beta-blocker: risk of complete AV block and haemodynamic collapse
    • Caution in severe LVOTO or significant sinus node disease
  • Disopyramide (add-on to beta-blocker for persistent obstructive symptoms, ESC 2023 Class IIa[1]):
    • Start 100mg tds → maintenance 100–150mg tds (total 300–600mg/day)
    • Always combine with beta-blocker or verapamil: disopyramide has vagolytic properties that can accelerate AV conduction → risk of rapid ventricular response if AF develops
    • Monitor QTc (withdraw if QTc >500ms), anticholinergic side effects (urinary retention, dry mouth, blurred vision)
    • Reduce dose in renal impairment (renally excreted)
  • Mavacamten (cardiac myosin inhibitor, NICE TA913[6], ESC 2023 Class IIa[1] for oHCM; efficacy shown in EXPLORER-HCM[9] and, for reducing the need for septal reduction therapy, VALOR-HCM[10]):

    The dosing, genotyping and monitoring details below combine the product SmPC with a local ICC-service SOP[8]; exact protocols vary between centres and should be checked against your local pathway and the current SmPC.

    • CYP2C19 genotyping required before prescribing: metabolised 74% by CYP2C19, 18% CYP3A4. Poor metabolisers (2–4% Caucasian, up to 18% Asian): maximum dose 5mg od; start at 2.5mg. Intermediate/normal/rapid metabolisers: start at 5mg (or 2.5mg if on strong CYP2C19 inhibitor)
    • Discontinue disopyramide and/or rate-limiting calcium channel blockers at least 5 days before initiating mavacamten
    • Echo at weeks 4, 8 and 12 after initiation; every 6 months on maintenance if stable
    • Escalate: 2.5mg → 5mg → 10mg → 15mg od based on Valsalva LVOTO gradient and LVEF (max 5mg if poor metaboliser or on strong CYP2C19 inhibitor)
    • Stop/interrupt if LVEF <50% (negative inotropic effect); restart at 2.5mg once LVEF recovers
    • Pause if Valsalva LVOTO gradient <20mmHg at any assessment (risk of LVEF depression)
    • CYP2C19 inhibitors (omeprazole, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine): cap dose at 5mg. Avoid mavacamten with combined strong CYP2C19 + strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (absolute contraindication)
    • Contraindicated in pregnancy; confirmed negative pregnancy test required before initiation in women of reproductive age
    • NICE TA913: recommended for symptomatic (NYHA II-III) obstructive HCM with LVOT gradient ≥50mmHg uncontrolled on standard therapy, LVEF ≥55%
    • Obstructive vs non-obstructive: the benefit of myosin inhibitors is established in obstructive HCM. In non-obstructive HCM the evidence is weaker, MAVERICK-HCM[11] was a small phase 2 study and the phase 3 ODYSSEY-HCM[13] trial did not meet its primary endpoints for exercise capacity or symptoms
    • Emerging: aficamten, a next-generation cardiac myosin inhibitor, improved exercise capacity in symptomatic obstructive HCM in the phase 3 SEQUOIA-HCM[12] trial (not yet routine UK practice; evidence evolving)

Septal reduction therapy (for severe obstructive HCM, LVOT gradient ≥50mmHg on max medical therapy with NYHA III-IV):

  • Surgical myectomy (the preferred septal reduction therapy at experienced centres, particularly in younger patients and those with complex anatomy)
  • Alcohol septal ablation (for those unsuitable for surgery or patient preference; avoid in young patients if possible)

ICD for primary prevention: Based on HCM Risk-SCD calculator score[2]; see Risk section

Atrial fibrillation management: Anticoagulation mandatory regardless of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score; rhythm or rate control; amiodarone most effective antiarrhythmic

Complications

  • Sudden cardiac death (VT/VF): the most feared complication and may be the first presentation. It is an important cause of death in younger patients, but with contemporary management overall mortality is low and heart failure and AF-related stroke account for more deaths in older cohorts[1]
  • Atrial fibrillation: common and poorly tolerated, carrying a disproportionately high stroke and thromboembolic risk relative to general-population AF[1]
  • Heart failure: via two routes, diastolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and end-stage "burnt-out" HCM with systolic impairment and LV remodelling (a minority, poor prognosis, transplant pathway)
  • Dynamic LVOT obstruction: drives exertional dyspnoea, angina and presyncope or syncope, with accompanying systolic anterior motion (SAM) mediated mitral regurgitation
  • Apical aneurysm: a feature of apical or mid-cavity HCM that harbours thrombus (an embolic source) and forms a re-entrant arrhythmic focus. Empirical anticoagulation is generally advised once the aneurysm reaches roughly 2 cm, independent of AF status (expert consensus, no randomised trial)[15]

Risk Stratification

ESC 2023 Guidelines - SCD Risk Stratification in HCM[1]

Recommended Risk Stratification Tools:

Risk Categories and ICD Recommendations:

Risk Category 5-Year SCD Risk ICD Recommendation
Low Risk <4% Class IIb (may be considered with specific features*)
Intermediate Risk ≥4% to <6% Class IIb (may be considered via shared decision-making)
High Risk ≥6% Class IIa (should be considered)

*Additional Risk Modifiers (in low-risk patients):

  • Extensive LGE (≥15%) on CMR - Class IIb
  • LVEF <50% - Class IIb

Shared Decision-Making Emphasis:

  • Consider lifelong risk of ICD complications
  • Discuss competing mortality risks (heart failure, stroke)
  • Account for impact on lifestyle and psychological health
  • Consider socioeconomic factors

Reference: Arbelo E et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2023;44:3503-3626[1]

HCM Risk-SCD Calculator (5-year risk)

O'Mahony et al. 2014[2] · Validated in ESC 2023 guidelines · Adults ≥16 years only

This tool is for educational purposes only and must not replace clinical judgement or the validated online tool at qxmd.com. Does not account for LGE extent, apical aneurysm, or LVEF, consider these modifiers separately.

Additional risk modifiers (outside calculator):

  • Extensive LGE (>15% LV mass) on CMR, independent predictor of SCD (Class IIb modifier)
  • LVEF <50%, Class IIb modifier
  • LV apical aneurysm, high-risk feature; ICD strongly recommended
  • End-stage/burnt-out HCM, separate management pathway

Pregnancy Management

ESC 2018 Pregnancy Guidelines - HCM (mWHO Class II-III)

PRECONCEPTION COUNSELLING:

  • Risk stratification:
    • mWHO Class II (good functional class, no LVOTO, LVEF >50%): Low risk - pregnancy generally well tolerated
    • mWHO Class II-III (LVEF <50%, NYHA III-IV, LVOT gradient >50 mmHg): Significantly increased risk
    • mWHO Class IV (severe symptomatic LVOTO, advanced HF): Pregnancy contraindicated
  • Baseline assessment: Full echo (LVEF, LVOT gradient, LA size), ECG, Holter monitoring, exercise test
  • Medications:
    • Beta-blockers (metoprolol, labetalol) safe - continue throughout
    • Stop ACE inhibitors/ARBs (teratogenic) - switch before conception
    • Disopyramide contraindicated (oxytocic - induces labour)
    • Mavacamten, stop pre-conception; effective contraception required (animal reproductive toxicity documented; no human safety data)
  • ICD: Safe during pregnancy; maintain if already implanted
  • Genetic counselling: 50% transmission risk (autosomal dominant); prenatal testing available

PREGNANCY MANAGEMENT:

  • Monitoring:
    • Echo each trimester (more frequently if symptomatic or obstructive)
    • Monthly cardiology review if mWHO II-III
    • Low threshold for Holter if palpitations (arrhythmias, including AF, are more common in pregnancy)
  • Physiological changes:
    • Increased plasma volume may worsen LVOTO
    • Increased heart rate reduces diastolic filling time
    • Most women remain stable or improve slightly
  • Medical therapy:
    • Continue beta-blockers (metoprolol 50-200mg/day)
    • Verapamil safe if beta-blocker intolerant
    • Avoid vasodilators (worsen LVOTO)
    • If new AF: anticoagulate with LMWH (warfarin only in 2nd trimester if essential)
  • Red flags requiring urgent review:
    • New or worsening dyspnea, chest pain, syncope, palpitations
    • Clinical deterioration (NYHA class worsening)

LABOUR & DELIVERY:

  • Delivery planning:
    • Vaginal delivery preferred in most cases (mWHO II)
    • MDT discussion at 32-34 weeks (cardiology, obstetrics, anaesthetics)
    • Delivery at tertiary centre with cardiac expertise
  • Mode of delivery:
    • Vaginal delivery: Safe if NYHA I-II, no severe LVOTO
    • Elective caesarean section if: Severe LVOTO (>50 mmHg), NYHA III-IV, AF on anticoagulation, obstetric indications
    • Assisted second stage (forceps/ventouse) to reduce maternal effort if obstructive
  • Anaesthesia:
    • Epidural safe (preferred for pain relief) - careful titration to avoid hypotension
    • Avoid spinal if significant LVOTO (rapid vasodilation worsens gradient)
    • GA if caesarean: maintain preload and afterload, avoid tachycardia
  • Intrapartum monitoring:
    • Continuous ECG monitoring (arrhythmia risk)
    • Invasive BP monitoring if severe LVOTO or haemodynamic instability
    • Maintain adequate preload (IV fluids) but avoid volume overload
  • Haemorrhage management:
    • Avoid ergometrine (vasoconstriction worsens LVOTO)
    • Syntocinon safe but give slowly (bolus can cause hypotension)
    • If significant PPH: crystalloid resuscitation, avoid excessive vasodilators

POSTPARTUM:

  • Immediate postpartum (0-48 hours): Highest risk period for fluid shifts, arrhythmia
    • HDU/CCU monitoring for mWHO II-III for 24-48 hours
    • Careful fluid balance (avoid overload)
  • Restart medications: Reintroduce ACE inhibitors if needed (caution if breastfeeding)
  • Follow-up: Echo at 6 weeks, return to pre-pregnancy baseline expected
  • Contraception: All methods safe; COCP generally avoided if multiple risk factors
  • Breastfeeding: Safe; beta-blockers (metoprolol, labetalol) compatible

CONTRAINDICATIONS TO PREGNANCY:

  • NYHA Class IV symptoms
  • Severe symptomatic LVOTO despite medical therapy
  • Severe systolic dysfunction (LVEF <30%)
  • Recurrent sustained VT

Follow-up

Based on ESC 2023 Cardiomyopathy guidelines[1].

Advanced / complicated = significant LVOTO, NYHA III–IV symptoms, falling LVEF or end-stage progression, sustained arrhythmia (AF, NSVT/VT), prior aborted SCD, or an implanted device.

Genotype-positive / phenotype-negative (G+/P−) = a confirmed pathogenic-variant carrier with no overt disease expression yet.

Genotype+ / Phenotype−Uncomplicated / StableAdvanced / Complicated
FrequencyEvery 2–5 yrs (adults); 1–2 yrly if youngEvery 1–2 yearsEvery 3–6 months
Clinical reviewSymptoms, exam, BPSymptoms, NYHA, exam, resting/standing BPAs above + fluid status, device interrogation
ECGEach screening visitAnnual 12-leadEach visit
EchocardiographyEach screening visit (early LVH)Every 1–2 years (gradient, LV function, wall thickness)6-monthly
Holter / ambulatoryNot routineEvery 1–2 years (48h, SCD risk & AF detection)6-monthly or symptom-directed
Exercise testNot routineEvery 2–3 years (capacity, BP response, provocable LVOTO)Annual / as indicated
CMRConsider (detects early phenotype)Every 2–5 years (LGE burden)As clinically indicated
Family screeningCascade ECG + echo from age 10–12

Disclaimer: This table is general guidance based on published guidelines and does not replace clinical judgement. The responsible clinician is accountable for determining the appropriate, individualised follow-up plan for each patient.

Key Points

  • Avoid vasodilators and high-dose diuretics in obstructive HCM (can worsen LVOT gradient)[1]
  • Screen first-degree relatives with ECG and echo (start age 10-12 or earlier if symptomatic)[1]
  • Anticoagulation required for all AF (CHA2DS2-VASc not applicable)[1]
  • Exercise and competitive sport: ESC 2020/2023 favour an individualised, shared decision-making approach based on risk assessment rather than blanket disqualification[3]; recreational exercise is encouraged, and competitive/vigorous sport may be reasonable for many lower-risk individuals. The prospective LIVE-HCM study found no increase in serious arrhythmic events in HCM patients who exercised vigorously[14]
  • Ensure preconception counselling for all women of childbearing age[5]
  • Annual follow-up minimum; more frequent if symptomatic or high-risk
  • Offer genetic testing to patients with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of HCM, primarily to enable cascade screening of relatives; yield is highest with a sarcomeric phenotype or a positive family history, and the result rarely alters the proband's own management[1]

References & Review Date

Last reviewed: June 2026

  1. Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
  2. O'Mahony C, et al. A novel clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM Risk-SCD). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(30):2010–2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu119
  3. Pelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(1):17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605
  4. Maron BJ, et al. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 3. Circulation. 2015;132(22):e273–e280. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000239
  5. Regitz-Zagrosek V, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(34):3165–3241. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340
  6. NICE Technology Appraisal TA913 (2023). Mavacamten for treating symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. nice.org.uk/guidance/ta913
  7. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF). BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press. bnf.nice.org.uk
  8. NHS Tayside Inherited Cardiac Conditions Service. Mavacamten (CAMZYOS) Standard Operating Procedure. Review date: October 2026. [Internal SOP document]
  9. Olivotto I, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759–769. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X
  10. Desai MY, et al. Myosin inhibition in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy referred for septal reduction therapy (VALOR-HCM). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(2):95–108. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.048
  11. Ho CY, et al. Evaluation of mavacamten in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (MAVERICK-HCM). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(21):2649–2660. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.064
  12. Maron MS, et al. Aficamten for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEQUOIA-HCM). N Engl J Med. 2024;390(20):1849–1861. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2401424
  13. Mavacamten in symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ODYSSEY-HCM): a phase 3 randomised trial (mavacamten did not meet its primary endpoints). N Engl J Med. 2025. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2505927
  14. Lampert R, et al. Vigorous exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (LIVE-HCM). JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8(6):595–605. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1042
  15. Ommen SR, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2024;149(23):e1239–e1311. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250