ACM is characterised by fibrofatty myocardial replacement, ventricular arrhythmias and sudden-death risk; it may be right, left or biventricular.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
Which phenotype abbreviation refers to left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy?
Explanation
Guidance describes ARVC as right-dominant, ABVC as biventricular and ALVC as left-dominant.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
Which is the most common classic RV-dominant ARVC gene listed?
Explanation
PKP2 is listed as the most common gene and is associated with classic RV-dominant ARVC.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
Which CMR pattern is particularly characteristic of LV-dominant DSP/FLNC/PLN-related ACM?
Explanation
Ring-like LGE in at least three Bull’s Eye segments is highlighted as a hallmark of ALVC, especially DSP/FLNC/PLN.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
What exercise advice is emphasised for diagnosed ACM?
Explanation
Guidance states that endurance and high-intensity exercise can accelerate disease and should be avoided in diagnosed ACM.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Sports Cardiology Guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605; James CA, et al. Exercise and ARVC penetrance/risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1290–1297. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.033
Under the 2024 European Task Force criteria, definite ACM can be diagnosed by which combination?
Explanation
Guidance states definite ACM requires 2 major, or 1 major + 2 minor, or 4 minor criteria from different categories.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
What is first-line medical therapy for ACM patients with arrhythmias?
Explanation
Beta-blockers are listed as Grade I first-line therapy for patients with arrhythmias, dosed as high as tolerated.
ReferenceCappelletto C, et al. Antiarrhythmic therapy and risk of cumulative ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2021;334:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.069; Rolland T, et al. Safety and efficacy of flecainide associated with beta-blockers in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2021. doi:10.1093/europace/euab182
Guidance lists flecainide as an add-on if beta-blocker alone is insufficient and states not to use it as monotherapy.
ReferenceCappelletto C, et al. Antiarrhythmic therapy and risk of cumulative ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2021;334:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.069; Rolland T, et al. Safety and efficacy of flecainide associated with beta-blockers in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2021. doi:10.1093/europace/euab182
Guidance lists survivors of cardiac arrest or sustained VT causing syncope/haemodynamic compromise as Class I ICD indications.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
Which condition is listed as an ACM phenocopy/mimic to exclude?
Explanation
Guidance lists myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis among phenocopies/mimics that can fulfil diagnostic criteria but are not genetic ACM.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Corrado D, et al. European Task Force ACM diagnostic criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2024;395:131447. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131447
A patient with ACM and an ICD receives an appropriate shock for a ventricular arrhythmia. What is the Group 1 driving restriction?
Explanation
An appropriate shock is a secondary-prevention event and carries a six-month Group 1 restriction. A primary-prevention implant requires one month, and an inappropriate shock two weeks provided the cause has been corrected.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
What effect does an implanted ICD have on Group 2 (bus/lorry, HGV/PCV) licensing in the UK?
Explanation
Any ICD is a permanent bar to Group 2 licensing. A pacemaker alone may be compatible with Group 2 if the underlying condition allows, subject to DVLA assessment. Group 2 standards also generally treat any syncope or near-syncope within five years as disqualifying.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
Which approach to labour and delivery is recommended for a woman with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy?
Explanation
Pregnancy raises sympathetic tone and volume load, which can increase arrhythmic risk. Beta-blockers are continued at the maximum tolerated dose and epidural analgesia is generally preferred because it blunts the catecholamine response. Mode and timing of delivery are decided by the Pregnancy Heart Team on the basis of functional status and arrhythmia history rather than a fixed rule. Resuscitation equipment including a defibrillator should be available for delivery.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Which exercise advice applies to arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy?
Explanation
ACM carries among the stricter exercise restrictions of the cardiomyopathies because of the “exercise paradox”: endurance and high-intensity exercise can accelerate disease progression, and even moderate exercise may worsen the phenotype. Moderate-intensity recreational activity may still be considered after specialist review and shared decision-making, so this is individualised rather than an absolute prohibition.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605; James CA, et al. Exercise increases age-related penetrance and arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy-associated desmosomal mutation carriers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1290–1297. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.033
A genotype-positive, phenotype-negative relative in an ACM family asks about exercise. Which response is correct?
Explanation
The general matrix row for gene-positive, phenotype-negative individuals permits low, moderate and vigorous intensity with annual review, treating competitive sport as a shared decision. ACM is the important exception to read carefully: exercise dose is associated with age-related penetrance and arrhythmic risk in desmosomal variant carriers, so this population warrants individualised specialist advice rather than the generic row.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605; James CA, et al. Exercise increases age-related penetrance and arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy-associated desmosomal mutation carriers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1290–1297. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.033
A patient with clinically definite ACM has a negative gene panel. What does this result mean?
Explanation
A negative genetic result does not exclude inherited disease. Genotype-negative disease is well recognised in ACM/ARVC, HCM, DCM and Brugada syndrome. Where the proband has no identifiable pathogenic variant, cascade genetic testing is not possible and relatives are followed with clinical screening instead.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Definitionfoundation
Which definition best matches DCM?
Explanation
DCM is defined by LV or biventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction after excluding abnormal loading conditions and coronary artery disease.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Which DCM gene is particularly associated with conduction disease before DCM and early ICD consideration?
Explanation
LMNA cardiomyopathy commonly shows conduction/arrhythmic disease before overt DCM and carries high arrhythmic risk.
ReferenceHasselberg NE, et al. Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:853–860. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx596; Castrichini M, et al. LMNA LGE patterns. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14:e041230. doi:10.1161/JAHA.124.041230
Which combination represents foundational medical therapy (the 2026 ESC term for what was previously called GDMT or the “four pillars”) for heart failure in DCM?
Explanation
Guidance lists ACEi/ARB/ARNI, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and SGLT2 inhibitor. The 2026 ESC heart failure guideline renames this group foundational medical therapy (FMT); “GDMT” and “four pillars” are retired terms, though the four drug classes themselves are unchanged.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Køber L, et al. 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2026. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehag100
For standard primary-prevention ICD consideration in DCM, which LVEF threshold is listed after at least 3 months of foundational medical therapy?
Explanation
Guidance lists primary-prevention ICD for LVEF ≤35% despite ≥3 months of foundational medical therapy, with NYHA II–III and suitable life expectancy. The ≤35% device threshold comes from the ESC 2022 ventricular arrhythmia/SCD guideline and is unchanged by the 2026 heart failure phenotype revision.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)CMR riskadvanced
What is important about late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in DCM?
Explanation
The DCM section notes that LGE presence, location and extent inform SCD risk beyond LVEF alone.
ReferenceHalliday BP, et al. Outcome in DCM related to extent/location/pattern of LGE. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1645–1655. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.015
Which LMNA risk-factor set is listed for ICD consideration?
Explanation
Guidance lists LMNA ICD consideration when at least two risk factors are present: NSVT, LVEF <45%, male sex and non-missense variant.
ReferenceHasselberg NE, et al. Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:853–860. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx596; Castrichini M, et al. LMNA LGE patterns. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;14:e041230. doi:10.1161/JAHA.124.041230
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Pregnancyintermediate
Which DCM pregnancy scenario is classified as mWHO IV/contraindicated?
Explanation
Guidance lists LVEF <30% or NYHA III–IV as mWHO IV, where pregnancy is contraindicated.
ReferenceRegitz-Zagrosek V, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3165–3241. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340
Under DVLA guidance, when may a driver with DCM continue to hold a Group 1 (car/motorcycle) licence?
Explanation
For Group 1, DCM that is asymptomatic with LVEF above 40% is compatible with driving, with annual review. If symptomatic or LVEF is 40% or below, the driver must notify DVLA and cease driving if symptomatic. Group 2 requires LVEF of 45% or more with no symptomatic heart failure and no significant arrhythmia.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
A patient with DCM receives an ICD for primary prevention. Under Group 1 DVLA rules, how long must they stop driving?
Explanation
A primary-prevention ICD requires one month off Group 1 driving. This differs from the secondary-prevention situation: after an appropriate shock the restriction is six months, and after an inappropriate shock it is two weeks provided the cause has been corrected.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
Where DVLA notification is required for an inherited cardiac condition, whose responsibility is it to notify the DVLA?
Explanation
Notification is the patient’s responsibility. The patient must also stop driving if told to do so or if the condition worsens, attend reviews as required (typically every one to three years) and inform their car insurer of the medical condition.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Pregnancyfoundation
Which heart failure drugs must be stopped before conception in a woman with DCM?
Explanation
ACE inhibitors, ARBs and sacubitril/valsartan are fetotoxic and are stopped pre-conception. Spironolactone is antiandrogenic and is avoided or switched to eplerenone, and SGLT2 inhibitors are stopped because human data are inadequate. Beta-blockers and, where needed, furosemide and digoxin are generally continued.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Pregnancyintermediate
Which anticoagulant is preferred during pregnancy for a woman with DCM who requires anticoagulation?
Explanation
Low molecular weight heparin is the anticoagulant of choice in pregnancy because it does not cross the placenta, though it requires dose adjustment and monitoring. DOACs are contraindicated: they cross the placenta, show fetal and embryo toxicity in animal studies and have no human safety data. Warfarin has a specific, restricted role in mechanical valve disease only.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Exerciseintermediate
When is competitive sport contraindicated in DCM?
Explanation
Competitive sport is advised only when LVEF is above 50% with no LGE and a normal exercise test, and is contraindicated below 50%. Vigorous exercise is contraindicated if LVEF is under 45% or the patient is symptomatic, and any exercise is contraindicated during decompensation. LMNA variants warrant careful monitoring regardless of LVEF.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
A variant of uncertain significance (VUS) is identified in a cardiomyopathy gene in a proband with DCM. What follows?
Explanation
Only a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant that has been shown to fit the phenotype enables cascade testing of relatives. A VUS is not a diagnosis, must not be used to justify predictive testing, and does not alter the need for clinical family screening, which continues on phenotype regardless of the variant’s classification.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Fabry DiseaseDefinitionfoundation
Fabry disease is caused by deficiency of which enzyme?
Explanation
Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficient alpha-galactosidase A activity.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease management recommendations. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseaseGeneticsfoundation
Which gene is implicated in Fabry disease?
Explanation
Fabry disease is caused by pathogenic variants in GLA on Xq22.1.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease management recommendations. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseaseInheritancefoundation
Which inheritance pattern best describes Fabry disease?
Explanation
Fabry disease is X-linked; males are hemizygous and females can be variably affected due to X-inactivation.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease management recommendations. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseaseDiagnosisintermediate
In a female suspected of Fabry disease, which diagnostic step is mandatory because enzyme activity may be normal?
Explanation
Guidance states enzyme activity is often normal in females, so GLA sequencing is mandatory for diagnosis and cascade screening.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease management recommendations. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseasePhenotypefoundation
Which combination is typical of classic Fabry disease?
Explanation
Classic Fabry disease includes angiokeratomas, acroparesthesias, hypohidrosis/corneal verticillata, renal, cardiac and cerebrovascular disease.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease revisited: Management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseaseCMRintermediate
Which CMR feature supports Fabry cardiac involvement?
Explanation
Guidance lists concentric LVH, inferolateral mid-wall LGE and low T1 values as Fabry CMR features.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease management recommendations. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseaseTherapyfoundation
Which disease-specific treatments are listed for Fabry disease?
Explanation
Fabry therapy includes agalsidase alfa/beta enzyme replacement and migalastat chaperone therapy for amenable GLA variants.
ReferenceNICE HST6. Agalsidase alfa and beta for Fabry disease. 2017; Hughes DA, et al. Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study. J Med Genet. 2017;54:288–296. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178; NICE HST4. Migalastat for Fabry disease. 2017
Fabry DiseaseMigalastatintermediate
Which statement about migalastat is correct?
Explanation
Migalastat is an oral chaperone used only for amenable GLA variants and is dosed every other day.
ReferenceNICE HST6. Agalsidase alfa and beta for Fabry disease. 2017; Hughes DA, et al. Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study. J Med Genet. 2017;54:288–296. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178; NICE HST4. Migalastat for Fabry disease. 2017
Fabry DiseaseScreeningintermediate
Which male patient group should be highlighted for alpha-Gal A enzyme testing?
Explanation
Guidance recommends alpha-Gal A enzyme testing in all males with unexplained LVH, especially with red flags.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease management recommendations. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123:416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseasePregnancyintermediate
Which statement about Fabry disease treatment in pregnancy is correct?
Explanation
Migalastat has no human pregnancy data and is stopped pre-conception. Continuation of enzyme replacement therapy may be considered where clinically indicated after specialist discussion, though the supporting evidence is reassuring but limited to case series. ACE inhibitors and ARBs are stopped pre-conception, and echocardiography with renal function is monitored each trimester.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Fabry DiseaseGenetic testingintermediate
Why is it important to exclude phenocopies before assigning an inherited cardiomyopathy diagnosis?
Explanation
Phenotype precedes genotype. Acquired causes and phenocopies must be excluded before an inherited diagnosis is assigned, because the clinical syndrome guides test selection. Fabry disease is a treatable phenocopy of HCM, so recognising it changes management as well as the genetic pathway followed.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Which is listed as a high-risk marker for sudden cardiac death in HCM?
Explanation
Guidance lists NSVT, unexplained syncope, massive LVH and family history of SCD among HCM high-risk markers.
ReferenceO’Mahony C, et al. HCM Risk-SCD model. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2010–2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht439; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
For adults aged ≥16 years with HCM, which tool is recommended for 5-year SCD risk estimation?
Explanation
Guidance identifies the HCM Risk-SCD calculator for adults ≥16 years.
ReferenceO’Mahony C, et al. HCM Risk-SCD model. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2010–2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht439; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Why should verapamil generally not be combined with a beta-blocker in obstructive HCM management?
Explanation
Guidance warns not to combine verapamil with beta-blockers because of risk of complete AV block and haemodynamic collapse.
ReferenceO’Mahony C, et al. HCM Risk-SCD model. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2010–2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht439; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
A patient with isolated, asymptomatic HCM holds a standard car licence (Group 1). What does UK DVLA guidance indicate?
Explanation
Whether DVLA notification is required depends on the condition, current symptoms and licence group, not a single blanket rule. For an isolated HCM diagnosis a Group 1 (car/motorcycle) driver generally does not need to notify DVLA unless another disqualifying feature is present. A Group 2 (bus/lorry) driver must notify DVLA of the diagnosis. Each case is assessed individually. Disqualifying features to look for include syncope, sustained arrhythmia and significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
Which combination must be satisfied for a driver with HCM to hold a Group 2 (bus/lorry, HGV/PCV) licence under DVLA guidance?
Explanation
Group 2 licensing applies a higher medical standard than Group 1 because of the greater public-safety risk, and the burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate fitness rather than merely the absence of disqualifying features. Specialist review is typically annual and DVLA may issue shorter-duration licences. The Group 2 standard requires an LVOT gradient below 30 mmHg, wall thickness under 30 mm, no syncope, no non-sustained VT, a normal blood-pressure response to exercise and an LVEF of 45% or more.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
A woman with obstructive HCM is planning a pregnancy. Which medication change is required?
Explanation
Mavacamten has no human pregnancy data and animal reproductive toxicity, so it is stopped pre-conception with effective contraception. Disopyramide is uterotonic and may stimulate contractions, particularly in the first trimester. Beta-blockers (bisoprolol or metoprolol preferred) are generally continued, with verapamil an option if beta-blockers are not tolerated.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
A woman with HCM attends pre-pregnancy counselling. What does the modified WHO (mWHO) classification describe?
Explanation
mWHO classifies maternal cardiovascular risk from I (no detectable increase in mortality, local obstetric care) to IV (extremely high maternal risk requiring detailed individualised counselling before conception). The class listed for a condition is a starting point rather than a fixed assignment: risk should be individualised by a Pregnancy Heart Team using modifiers such as ventricular function, arrhythmia history, aortic dimensions and genotype. The class guides where care is delivered and how often review occurs.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Which of the following is listed as a high-risk feature warranting exercise restriction in HCM?
Explanation
High-risk features warranting restriction include prior exertional syncope or presyncope, sustained ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest, a family history of sudden cardiac death in young relatives, severe LVH of 30 mm or more, extensive LGE (15% or more of LV mass), LVOT gradient above 50 mmHg, apical aneurysm, LVEF below 50%, NSVT, an abnormal BP response to exercise, or an HCM Risk-SCD score of 6% or more.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605; Ommen SR, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2024;149. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250
Low intensity is below 3 METs and under 50% of maximum heart rate, with conversation held easily. Moderate is 3–6 METs at 50–70% of maximum heart rate. Vigorous is above 6 METs at 70–85%, where talking is difficult. Competitive sport is defined separately by organised training and a performance focus.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605
In a family with HCM, who should be offered genetic testing first?
Explanation
Genetic testing is most informative in an affected proband with a well-defined phenotype. Phenotype comes before genotype: the clinical syndrome guides which test is chosen, not the reverse. The aim is to confirm a diagnosis, refine prognosis in selected conditions, enable cascade testing and support reproductive counselling.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Marfan SyndromeDefinitionfoundation
Marfan syndrome is most commonly caused by variants in which gene?
Explanation
Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder caused by FBN1 variants.
ReferenceLoeys BL, et al. Revised Ghent nosology for Marfan syndrome. J Med Genet. 2010;47:476–485. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.072785
Marfan SyndromeInheritancefoundation
What is the recurrence risk for a first-degree relative of someone with a pathogenic autosomal dominant FBN1 variant?
Explanation
Guidance states first-degree relatives have a 50% risk of inheriting the pathogenic variant.
ReferenceLoeys BL, et al. Revised Ghent nosology for Marfan syndrome. J Med Genet. 2010;47:476–485. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.072785
Marfan SyndromeDiagnostic criteriaintermediate
In the absence of family history, which combination can confirm Marfan syndrome under revised Ghent criteria?
Explanation
Revised Ghent criteria include aortic root dilatation/dissection plus ectopia lentis in the absence of family history.
ReferenceErbel R, et al. 2014 ESC aortic disease guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281; Mazzolai L, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3538–3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
Marfan SyndromeInvestigationsfoundation
Which investigation is mandatory to assess the cardinal cardiovascular risk in Marfan syndrome?
Explanation
Echocardiography measures aortic-root dimensions at the sinuses of Valsalva using age/BSA Z-scores.
ReferenceErbel R, et al. 2014 ESC aortic disease guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281; Mazzolai L, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3538–3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
Marfan SyndromeTreatmentintermediate
Which medication class is listed as first-line to reduce aortic growth rate in Marfan syndrome?
Explanation
Guidance lists beta-blockers such as atenolol as first-line medical therapy to reduce aortic growth rate.
ReferenceLacro RV, et al. Atenolol vs losartan in Marfan syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2061–2071. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1404731; Groenink M, et al. COMPARE losartan trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3491–3500. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht334
Marfan SyndromeARB therapyintermediate
Which statement about losartan/ARB use in Marfan syndrome is correct?
Explanation
Guidance lists losartan as additive to beta-blocker but to avoid in pregnancy and switch before conception.
ReferenceRegitz-Zagrosek V, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3165–3241. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340
Marfan SyndromeSurgery thresholdintermediate
What prophylactic aortic-root surgery threshold is listed for Marfan syndrome without additional risk factors?
Explanation
Guidance lists prophylactic aortic-root replacement at ≥50 mm, or ≥45 mm if risk factors are present.
ReferenceErbel R, et al. 2014 ESC aortic disease guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281; Mazzolai L, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3538–3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
Marfan SyndromeSurgery risk factorsadvanced
Which factor lowers the prophylactic surgery threshold in Marfan syndrome to around ≥45 mm?
Explanation
Guidance lists family history of dissection, rapid growth >3 mm/year or concurrent surgery as factors for a lower ≥45 mm threshold.
ReferenceErbel R, et al. 2014 ESC aortic disease guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281; Mazzolai L, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3538–3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
Marfan SyndromePregnancyintermediate
Which Marfan pregnancy scenario is listed as mWHO IV/contraindicated?
Explanation
Guidance lists aortic root >45 mm, prior aortic dissection or rapid growth as mWHO IV/contraindicated/highest risk scenarios.
ReferenceRegitz-Zagrosek V, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3165–3241. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340
Marfan SyndromeLifestylefoundation
Which lifestyle recommendation is consistent with Marfan management?
Explanation
Guidance advises avoiding heavy lifting, isometric exercise, contact sports and competitive sports; low-intensity aerobic activity is generally acceptable.
ReferenceErbel R, et al. 2014 ESC aortic disease guidelines. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281; Mazzolai L, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3538–3700. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179
Marfan SyndromeDriving (DVLA)foundation
How does DVLA guidance approach driving in Marfan syndrome and other aortopathies?
Explanation
Both Group 1 and Group 2 licensing in Marfan syndrome and aortopathy are assessed individually rather than against a fixed diameter, considering blood pressure control, aortic dimensions and absence of a dissection history. Always check the current DVLA cardiovascular guidance.
ReferenceDVLA. Assessing fitness to drive: a guide for medical professionals — cardiovascular chapter. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Swansea; current edition. Each case is assessed individually.
Marfan SyndromePregnancyfoundation
Which medication change is required before conception in a woman with Marfan syndrome?
Explanation
Losartan and ACE inhibitors are teratogenic and are stopped pre-conception, while the beta-blocker is continued. Aortic imaging is typically every four to six weeks during pregnancy, and postpartum imaging is repeated because dissection risk persists after delivery. Risk should be individualised by an aortopathy and Pregnancy Heart Team rather than judged against a single diameter cut-off.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–4568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Marfan SyndromeExerciseintermediate
What does ESC 2020 sports cardiology guidance advise about vigorous exercise in Marfan syndrome and heritable thoracic aortic disease?
Explanation
Vigorous exercise is contraindicated at all root sizes under ESC 2020. Moderate-intensity activity is restricted to a root below 40 mm and to non-contact activity, and contact or collision sport and competitive sport are contraindicated. Low-intensity exercise is permitted.
ReferencePelliccia A, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605
Marfan SyndromeGenetic testingintermediate
When can cascade genetic testing be offered to relatives in a family with Marfan syndrome?
Explanation
Cascade testing depends on first identifying a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in the proband and confirming that it fits the phenotype. A variant of uncertain significance does not support predictive testing. Relatives who test negative for a confirmed familial variant can usually be discharged from cardiac surveillance for that condition.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Geneticsfoundation
Which gene is implicated in long QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1)?
Explanation
LQT1 arises from loss-of-function variants in KCNQ1 (Iₖₛ current). KCNH2 causes LQT2, SCN5A causes LQT3, and RYR2 is the principal CPVT gene.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Zhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Geneticsfoundation
Approximately what proportion of genotype-positive long QT syndrome is accounted for by LQT1?
Explanation
LQT1 accounts for roughly 50% of genotype-positive cases, LQT2 for about 35–40%, and LQT3 for about 10%; the remaining genotypes are individually rare.
ReferenceZhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Phenotypesfoundation
A teenager collapses while swimming. Which long QT genotype is this trigger most characteristic of?
Explanation
Exercise, and swimming in particular, is the characteristic LQT1 trigger, which is why avoiding competitive swimming is a genotype-specific precaution in LQT1.
ReferenceZhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Phenotypesintermediate
Which genotype is most associated with events triggered by sudden auditory stimuli and by the postpartum period?
Explanation
LQT2 events are characteristically provoked by sudden loud noises or abrupt awakening, and LQT2 carries the highest arrhythmic risk in the postpartum period.
ReferenceZhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006; De Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Phenotypesintermediate
Which pattern best fits LQT3?
Explanation
LQT3 (SCN5A, persistent late sodium current) characteristically causes events at rest or during sleep, with a long isoelectric ST segment and a late T wave. Mexiletine is the genotype-directed add-on where indicated.
ReferenceZhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Investigationsintermediate
Low-amplitude, notched or bifid T waves on the resting ECG are most suggestive of which genotype?
Explanation
LQT2 is associated with low-amplitude notched or bifid T waves; LQT1 typically shows broad-based T waves, and LQT3 a long isoelectric ST segment with a late T wave. Morphology supports, but does not replace, genetic testing.
ReferenceZhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Diagnostic criteriaintermediate
What Schwartz score indicates a high probability of long QT syndrome?
Explanation
A Schwartz score of ≥3.5 in the absence of a secondary cause indicates a high probability of LQTS. The score combines ECG, clinical and family-history criteria.
ReferenceSchwartz PJ, et al. Diagnostic criteria for the long QT syndrome: an update. Circulation. 1993;88(2):782–784. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.88.2.782; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Diagnostic criteriaintermediate
Which ECG finding can support a diagnosis of long QT syndrome on its own, without a genetic result?
Explanation
A repeated QTc ≥500 ms with no secondary cause can support the diagnosis; a QTc ≥480 ms carries more weight when there is unexplained syncope. Borderline values alone are not diagnostic.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Schwartz PJ, et al. Diagnostic criteria for the long QT syndrome: an update. Circulation. 1993;88(2):782–784. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.88.2.782
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Treatmentintermediate
What serum potassium is targeted in long QT syndrome?
Explanation
Normal electrolytes are a general measure in LQTS: target K⁺ 4–5 mmol/L, and 4.5–5 mmol/L in LQT2 where Iₖᵣ is particularly sensitive to hypokalaemia. Avoid hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia and high-dose diuretics.
ReferenceZhu W, Bian X, Lv J. From genes to clinical management: a comprehensive review of long QT syndrome pathogenesis and treatment. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024;5(8):573–586. doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.006; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Drug safetyfoundation
Which beta-blocker is generally preferred in long QT syndrome, and what is the practical UK caveat?
Explanation
Nadolol is preferred for its long action and consistent levels; it is not routinely stocked in the UK and is arranged through hospital pharmacy. Propranolol is the usual alternative. Sotalol prolongs the QT interval and is not used here.
ReferenceJoint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF). bnf.nice.org.uk; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Diagnosisintermediate
A person carries a pathogenic LQTS variant but has a normal QTc on every ECG so far. What follows?
Explanation
A normal QTc does not exclude LQTS in a genotype-positive person. Drug precautions, electrolyte targets and follow-up still apply, and the QT-prolonging drug list should still be checked before any prescription.
ReferenceAsatryan B, et al. Unraveling complexities in genetically elusive long QT syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024;17(2):e012356. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012356; Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. Long QT syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2025;393:2023–2034.
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Pregnancyadvanced
Which statement best reflects current practice for pregnancy in long QT syndrome?
Explanation
Genotype, symptom history, QTc and current therapy are weighed together rather than mapped onto one fixed class. LQT2 carries the highest event risk in pregnancy and especially postpartum, so beta-blockade is continued and close follow-up maintained for around nine months after delivery.
ReferenceDe Backer J, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Which ECG pattern is diagnostic of Brugada syndrome?
Explanation
Only the Type 1 pattern is diagnostic: coved ST elevation of at least 2 mm followed by a negative T wave in one or more right precordial leads. Type 2 and Type 3 patterns are not diagnostic on their own and require provocation testing or further assessment.
ReferenceBrugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(6):1391–1396. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(92)90253-J; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Investigationsintermediate
Why are the right precordial leads recorded in the 2nd and 3rd intercostal spaces when Brugada syndrome is suspected?
Explanation
Lead placement matters: recording V1–V2 in the 2nd and 3rd intercostal spaces unmasks a Type 1 pattern that standard placement can miss. This applies to family screening ECGs as well.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Narasimhan B, et al. Brugada syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:38.
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Genetic testingintermediate
What is the approximate diagnostic yield of genetic testing in Brugada syndrome?
Explanation
SCN5A is identified in only around 20–30% of cases, a lower yield than the other channelopathies. Testing is still recommended, because an identified variant enables cascade screening; a negative result does not exclude the diagnosis.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Narasimhan B, et al. Brugada syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:38.
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Phenotypesfoundation
How does the clinical expression of Brugada syndrome differ between the sexes?
Explanation
Despite autosomal dominant inheritance affecting both sexes equally, clinical events show a marked male predominance, on the order of 8–10:1.
ReferenceNarasimhan B, et al. Brugada syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:38.; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Investigationsadvanced
In which situation is a sodium-channel-blocker provocation test contraindicated?
Explanation
Provocation testing carries real risk and is not appropriate for an asymptomatic person with a Type 2 pattern and no family history, where a positive result would not change management proportionately. It remains appropriate where the pre-test probability and clinical consequences justify it.
ReferenceWilde AAM, et al. Use, misuse, and pitfalls of the drug challenge test in the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(25):2427–2439. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad295
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Diagnosisadvanced
An asymptomatic person with no family history has a Type 1 pattern that appears only after ajmaline. What does this establish?
Explanation
A drug-induced Type 1 pattern in isolation, without symptoms or family history, is not diagnostic and is a recognised pitfall of the drug challenge test. Such patients are in the lower-risk group and an ICD is generally not indicated.
ReferenceWilde AAM, et al. Use, misuse, and pitfalls of the drug challenge test in the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(25):2427–2439. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad295; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Treatmentfoundation
Why is fever treated aggressively with antipyretics in Brugada syndrome?
Explanation
Fever is a recognised trigger for ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome, accounting for a small but important proportion of presentations, and should be treated promptly. This advice applies in pregnancy as well.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Narasimhan B, et al. Brugada syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:38.
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Risk stratificationadvanced
What role does inducibility of ventricular fibrillation at electrophysiological study play in Brugada syndrome?
Explanation
Programmed electrical stimulation has limited and controversial incremental value in Brugada syndrome. It may be considered in selected asymptomatic patients with a spontaneous Type 1 pattern, but not as a stand-alone ICD indication.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Narasimhan B, et al. Brugada syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11:38.
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)Treatmentadvanced
What is the role of quinidine in Brugada syndrome?
Explanation
Quinidine blocks Iₜₒ, normalising ST elevation and suppressing VF triggers. In the UK it is an unlicensed or SPECIALS product needing specialist pharmacy sourcing, and it requires QTc monitoring because it can paradoxically prolong the QT interval. Isoprenaline is used for acute electrical storm.
ReferenceJoint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF). bnf.nice.org.uk; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Which gene accounts for the majority of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia?
Explanation
Autosomal dominant gain-of-function variants in RYR2, the cardiac ryanodine receptor, account for around 55–65% of CPVT. SCN5A and KCNQ1 are long QT and Brugada genes; LAMP2 causes Danon disease.
ReferenceWalsh R, et al. Evaluation of gene validity for CPVT and short QT syndrome in sudden arrhythmic death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(15):1500–1510. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab687; Abbas M, Miles C, Behr E. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e20. doi:10.15420/aer.2022.09
How does CASQ2-related CPVT differ from the common form in its inheritance?
Explanation
CASQ2 (calsequestrin 2) CPVT is autosomal recessive and uncommon, at roughly 2–5% of cases. The recessive pattern changes the cascade-screening conversation with the family, since parents are usually unaffected carriers.
ReferenceWalsh R, et al. Evaluation of gene validity for CPVT and short QT syndrome in sudden arrhythmic death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(15):1500–1510. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab687; Abbas M, Miles C, Behr E. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e20. doi:10.15420/aer.2022.09
Which investigation is essential to diagnose CPVT?
Explanation
A normal resting ECG does not exclude CPVT: the diagnosis rests on reproducible exercise-induced ventricular ectopy or bidirectional or polymorphic VT, so the exercise test must be taken to maximal exertion and should not be curtailed.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Aggarwal A, et al. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: clinical characteristics, diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic strategies. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1781. doi:10.3390/jcm13061781
Which arrhythmia is the hallmark of CPVT on exercise testing?
Explanation
Bidirectional VT, in which the QRS axis alternates on successive beats, is characteristic of CPVT, though polymorphic VT is also seen. Ectopy typically emerges at a reproducible heart rate threshold and increases with workload.
ReferenceAbbas M, Miles C, Behr E. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e20. doi:10.15420/aer.2022.09; Aggarwal A, et al. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: clinical characteristics, diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic strategies. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1781. doi:10.3390/jcm13061781
Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia is seen in a patient. Which alternative diagnosis should be excluded before attributing it to CPVT?
Explanation
Digoxin toxicity is the classic mimic, producing bidirectional VT through a comparable mechanism of calcium overload. Drug history and a digoxin level belong in the assessment before the arrhythmia is attributed to CPVT.
ReferenceAggarwal A, et al. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: clinical characteristics, diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic strategies. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6):1781. doi:10.3390/jcm13061781; Luo S, Gómez AM. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: a narrative review of recent advances in genetics, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Asian Heart J. 2025;1:97–110. doi:10.1097/ah9.0000000000000018
Which statement about beta-blockers in CPVT is correct?
Explanation
Beta-blockade at the maximum tolerated dose is first-line for every diagnosed patient, symptomatic or not, with nadolol preferred. Abrupt withdrawal can be fatal. An ICD does not replace medical therapy.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Abbas M, Miles C, Behr E. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e20. doi:10.15420/aer.2022.09
Flecainide is added when there are breakthrough events or very high risk, and is always combined with a beta-blocker. QRS widening beyond about 25% prompts review, and the dose is reduced in renal impairment.
Referencevan der Werf C, et al. Flecainide therapy reduces exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(22):2244–2254. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.026; Zeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262
Approximately how much do beta-blockers alone, and beta-blockers combined with flecainide, reduce arrhythmic events in CPVT?
Explanation
Beta-blocker monotherapy gives significant but incomplete protection, at around 60–70% event reduction; adding flecainide raises this to roughly 80–90%. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation adds further protection where drug therapy is insufficient.
Referencevan der Werf C, et al. Flecainide therapy reduces exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(22):2244–2254. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.026; Lieve KV, et al. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia mediated by ryanodine receptor 2: a validated risk stratification. Eur Heart J. 2025. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf965
Why is an ICD approached cautiously in CPVT rather than implanted early?
Explanation
Painful shocks increase sympathetic tone and can precipitate further arrhythmia, including VF storms. Medical therapy is maximised first, and beta-blockers are continued after implantation. Secondary prevention after cardiac arrest, or syncope despite optimal therapy, remain clear indications.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Abbas M, Miles C, Behr E. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022;11:e20. doi:10.15420/aer.2022.09
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Diagnostic criteriafoundation
Which QTc value is accepted as diagnostic of short QT syndrome on its own?
Explanation
A QTc of ≤320 ms is a stand-alone diagnostic criterion. A QTc of 320–360 ms supports the diagnosis when accompanied by features such as a pathogenic variant, a family history, or unexplained cardiac arrest.
ReferenceZeppenfeld K, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(40):3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262; Boulmpou A, et al. The uncommon phenomenon of short QT syndrome: a scoping review. J Pers Med. 2025;15:105. doi:10.3390/jpm15030105
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Genetic testingintermediate
What is the approximate diagnostic yield of genetic testing in short QT syndrome?
Explanation
The yield is low, at roughly 20%, so a negative result does not exclude the diagnosis. A gene-validity reappraisal has reduced the number of genes considered to have robust evidence.
ReferenceWalsh R, et al. Evaluation of gene validity for CPVT and short QT syndrome in sudden arrhythmic death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(15):1500–1510. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab687; Boulmpou A, et al. The uncommon phenomenon of short QT syndrome: a scoping review. J Pers Med. 2025;15:105. doi:10.3390/jpm15030105
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Geneticsintermediate
Which gene has the strongest evidence of causation in short QT syndrome, and by what mechanism?
Explanation
Gain-of-function variants in KCNH2 increase Iₖᵣ, shortening repolarisation; this is SQT1, the gene with the strongest evidence. Loss of function in the same gene causes LQT2, the opposite phenotype.
ReferenceBrugada R, et al. Sudden death associated with short-QT syndrome linked to mutations in HERG. Circulation. 2004;109(1):30–35. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000109482.92774.3A; Walsh R, et al. Evaluation of gene validity for CPVT and short QT syndrome in sudden arrhythmic death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(15):1500–1510. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab687
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Investigationsfoundation
Which secondary causes of a short QT interval should be excluded before diagnosing short QT syndrome?
Explanation
Acquired QT shortening from hypercalcaemia, hyperkalaemia, acidosis or digoxin must be excluded first. Accurate measurement across several leads, using more than one correction formula, is equally important.
ReferenceBoulmpou A, et al. The uncommon phenomenon of short QT syndrome: a scoping review. J Pers Med. 2025;15:105. doi:10.3390/jpm15030105; Pérez-Riera AR, et al. Congenital short QT syndrome: a review focused on electrocardiographic features. J Electrocardiol. 2024;85:87–94. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.04.009
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Diagnostic criteriaadvanced
How does the Gollob score relate to current diagnostic practice in short QT syndrome?
Explanation
The Gollob score is an earlier proposed diagnostic scoring system. It is described separately from the current guideline criteria, which use QTc thresholds together with clinical and family-history features, so the two should not be conflated.
ReferenceBoulmpou A, et al. The uncommon phenomenon of short QT syndrome: a scoping review. J Pers Med. 2025;15:105. doi:10.3390/jpm15030105; Mazzanti A, et al. Novel insight into the natural history of short QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(13):1300–1308. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.078
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Family screeningfoundation
What is the inheritance pattern of short QT syndrome, and what follows for the family?
Explanation
Short QT syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, giving first-degree relatives a 50% prior risk, so family screening is essential. Where a pathogenic variant is identified, cascade genetic testing can be offered alongside ECG assessment.
ReferenceGussak I, et al. Idiopathic short QT interval: a new clinical syndrome? Cardiology. 2000;94(2):99–102. doi:10.1159/000047299; Boulmpou A, et al. The uncommon phenomenon of short QT syndrome: a scoping review. J Pers Med. 2025;15:105. doi:10.3390/jpm15030105
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Diagnosisintermediate
Which combination allows ATTR cardiac amyloidosis to be diagnosed without an endomyocardial biopsy?
Explanation
Perugini grade 2–3 uptake with no monoclonal protein detected gives a non-biopsy diagnosis of ATTR-CM with near-complete specificity. Both halves are required: imaging alone is not enough.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072; Kittleson MM, et al. 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Care for the Patient With Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(11):1076–1126. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Diagnosisadvanced
A bone scan shows grade 3 myocardial uptake, and a monoclonal protein is detected. What does this mean?
Explanation
Bone scintigraphy can be positive in AL amyloidosis too, so a monoclonal protein alongside a positive scan invalidates the non-biopsy pathway. Biopsy with typing by mass spectrometry or immunohistochemistry is then required.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072; Kittleson MM, et al. 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Care for the Patient With Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(11):1076–1126. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022
What constitutes an adequate monoclonal protein screen before a non-biopsy ATTR diagnosis?
Explanation
All three components are needed. Protein electrophoresis alone is insufficient and is a recognised way for a low-level plasma-cell dyscrasia to be missed, which would make a positive bone scan misleading.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072; Kittleson MM, et al. 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Care for the Patient With Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(11):1076–1126. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022
Once ATTR cardiac amyloidosis is established, why is TTR gene sequencing still required?
Explanation
Wild-type and hereditary ATTR are indistinguishable on imaging. Sequencing separates them, and identifying ATTRv triggers cascade screening of first-degree relatives.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Definitionfoundation
Which form of cardiac amyloidosis is the commonest in older people?
Explanation
ATTRwt is the commonest cardiac form in the elderly and is acquired rather than inherited, so it carries no implications for relatives. Hereditary ATTRv and AL are the other two forms to distinguish.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Geneticsintermediate
Which TTR variant is the most common cause of hereditary ATTR in people of Black African ancestry?
Explanation
V122I is the commonest ATTRv variant in Black patients, with a carrier frequency around 3–4%. V30M is common in Portuguese and Japanese populations. Inheritance is autosomal dominant, so first-degree relatives should be screened.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Diagnosisfoundation
Which finding is the classic red flag for cardiac amyloidosis on echocardiography and ECG together?
Explanation
The mismatch between thick walls on imaging and low voltages on the ECG is the classic clue, because infiltrate rather than myocyte hypertrophy causes the wall thickening. Bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, lumbar canal stenosis and intolerance of ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers are other recognised red flags.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072; Kittleson MM, et al. 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Care for the Patient With Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(11):1076–1126. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.022
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Treatmentintermediate
What did ATTR-ACT establish about tafamidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy?
Explanation
Tafamidis is a TTR stabiliser and was the first therapy shown to reduce mortality and cardiovascular hospitalisation in ATTR-CM. Because benefit is greatest early, disease-modifying therapy should not be deferred. Acoramidis is a newer stabiliser, and vutrisiran is a gene silencer with cardiovascular benefit in HELIOS-B.
ReferenceMaurer MS, et al. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-ACT). N Engl J Med. 2018;379(11):1007–1016. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1805689; NICE Technology Appraisal TA984 (2024). Tafamidis for treating transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy. nice.org.uk/guidance/ta984
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Drug safetyadvanced
Which statement about conventional heart-failure drugs in cardiac amyloidosis is correct?
Explanation
A relatively fixed stroke volume and marginal blood pressure mean these agents are frequently not tolerated, and digoxin binds amyloid fibrils. Loop diuretics, often at high doses, remain the mainstay for congestion, and an MRA is recommended in symptomatic heart failure irrespective of ejection fraction.
ReferenceGarcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072; Køber L, et al. 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2026. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehag100
Cardiac Amyloidosis (TTR/AL)Treatmentintermediate
How should newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement be handled?
Explanation
Untreated AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement carries a median survival of around six months, so referral is urgent. Daratumumab-based regimens are first-line following ANDROMEDA, and the Mayo stage drives prognosis and transplant eligibility.
ReferenceKastritis E, et al. Daratumumab-based treatment for immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (ANDROMEDA). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(1):46–58. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2028631; Garcia-Pavia P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: a position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–1568. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072
Danon Disease (LAMP2)Inheritancefoundation
What is the inheritance pattern of Danon disease?
Explanation
Danon disease results from variants in LAMP2 on Xq24 and is inherited in an X-linked dominant pattern. LAMP2 is integral to autophagy, and its loss produces intracytoplasmic vacuoles containing autophagic material.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Brambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020
Danon Disease (LAMP2)Phenotypeintermediate
How does Danon disease typically differ between males and females?
Explanation
Hemizygous males lack LAMP2 entirely and have early, severe disease with high mortality. Females are affected but later and more variably because of X-inactivation mosaicism, and they must not be dismissed as unaffected carriers.
ReferenceBrambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020
Danon Disease (LAMP2)Diagnosisintermediate
What is the classic clinical triad of Danon disease?
Explanation
The triad is complete in about 42% of males and is rare in females, so its absence does not exclude the diagnosis. Skeletal myopathy is present in roughly half of cases and cognitive impairment in about 56%, predominantly in males.
ReferenceBrambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020
Danon Disease (LAMP2)Investigationsintermediate
Which ECG finding occurs in roughly 40% of patients with Danon disease and should raise suspicion alongside severe left ventricular hypertrophy?
Explanation
Pre-excitation is found in roughly 40% of patients with no clear difference between the sexes, and conduction abnormalities in around 58%. Severe LVH combined with pre-excitation and a raised creatine kinase in a young male is highly suggestive, though LAMP2 testing is still needed to confirm it.
ReferenceBrambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Danon Disease (LAMP2)Family screeningadvanced
Why should LAMP2 testing be considered in a woman with unexplained dilated cardiomyopathy and a relevant family history?
Explanation
Around 29% of affected females present with a dilated phenotype, against under 4% of males, so restricting LAMP2 testing to hypertrophic phenotypes will miss them. All first-degree female relatives should be screened.
ReferenceBrambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020
Danon Disease (LAMP2)Treatmentadvanced
What is the mainstay of management in Danon disease?
Explanation
There is no disease-modifying therapy; standard heart-failure treatment is given but disease is often refractory, with about 44% reaching end-stage cardiomyopathy and around 20% requiring transplantation. An ICD is commonly considered even with preserved ejection fraction, though the Danon-specific evidence is limited and extrapolated. Gene therapy and substrate reduction remain investigational.
ReferenceBrambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Pompe Disease (GSD-II)Geneticsfoundation
What is the underlying defect in Pompe disease, and how is it inherited?
Explanation
Pompe disease is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder caused by acid α-glucosidase deficiency, leading to lysosomal glycogen accumulation. α-galactosidase A deficiency is Fabry disease, LAMP2 loss is Danon disease, and TTR misfolding causes hereditary amyloidosis.
Referencevan der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJJ. Pompe's disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9646):1342–1353. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61555-X; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Pompe Disease (GSD-II)Diagnosisintermediate
Which presentation should prompt urgent consideration of infantile-onset Pompe disease?
Explanation
The infantile form combines severe cardiomyopathy with massive hypertrophy, a short PR interval and muscle weakness, and is fatal within the first year without treatment. The other presentations point towards CPVT, cardiac amyloidosis and Danon disease respectively.
Referencevan der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJJ. Pompe's disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9646):1342–1353. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61555-X; Kishnani PS, et al. Pompe disease diagnosis and management guideline (ACMG). Genet Med. 2006;8(5):267–288. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000218152.87434.f3
Pompe Disease (GSD-II)Phenotypeintermediate
How does late-onset Pompe disease differ from the infantile form?
Explanation
Juvenile and adult-onset disease is dominated by proximal weakness and respiratory muscle involvement, with cardiac involvement less prominent, so respiratory assessment and non-invasive ventilation are central to management.
Referencevan der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJJ. Pompe's disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9646):1342–1353. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61555-X; Diaz-Manera J, et al. Safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa versus alglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (COMET). Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(12):1012–1026. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00241-6
Pompe Disease (GSD-II)Investigationsadvanced
How is a suspected diagnosis of Pompe disease confirmed?
Explanation
The dried blood spot is a screening test; a low result must be confirmed by a second method — an enzyme assay on alternative tissue, or GAA gene sequencing. In infantile-onset disease, CRIM status should also be determined before enzyme replacement therapy, because it predicts the immune response to treatment.
ReferenceKishnani PS, et al. Pompe disease diagnosis and management guideline (ACMG). Genet Med. 2006;8(5):267–288. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000218152.87434.f3; van der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJJ. Pompe's disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9646):1342–1353. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61555-X
Pompe Disease (GSD-II)Treatmentintermediate
Which statement about enzyme replacement therapy in Pompe disease is correct?
Explanation
Outcomes in infantile-onset disease depend on early treatment and CRIM status, so enzyme replacement should not be delayed. Alglucosidase alfa dramatically improved survival in the infantile form; avalglucosidase alfa met non-inferiority for respiratory function in COMET, and the choice of agent follows licensing and specialist guidance.
ReferenceDiaz-Manera J, et al. Safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa versus alglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (COMET). Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(12):1012–1026. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00241-6; Kishnani PS, et al. Pompe disease diagnosis and management guideline (ACMG). Genet Med. 2006;8(5):267–288. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000218152.87434.f3
Fabry DiseaseInvestigationsintermediate
Which resting ECG finding is characteristically seen in Fabry cardiac involvement?
Explanation
A short PR interval alongside voltage criteria for LVH is characteristic in Fabry disease. Low voltage with thick walls points instead towards cardiac amyloidosis. Conduction disease and bradyarrhythmia can develop later and may require pacing.
ReferencePieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(7):922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024; Dougherty S, et al. Cardiac manifestations of Fabry disease. npj Cardiovasc Health. 2025. doi:10.1038/s44325-025-00058-6
Fabry DiseaseInvestigationsfoundation
Which biomarker is elevated in Fabry disease and used in monitoring?
Explanation
Lyso-Gb3 is the disease-specific biomarker, checked alongside renal function at follow-up. Serum free light chains belong to the amyloidosis pathway and a raised creatine kinase points towards Danon or Pompe disease.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease revisited: management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123(4):416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(7):922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
Fabry DiseaseTreatmentadvanced
What is the main reason early diagnosis matters in Fabry cardiac disease?
Explanation
Enzyme replacement and chaperone therapy improve outcomes but do not reverse established fibrosis, so the window for benefit closes as late gadolinium enhancement develops. T1 mapping on CMR can detect involvement before overt hypertrophy appears.
ReferenceOrtiz A, et al. Fabry disease revisited: management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;123(4):416–427. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014; Pieroni M, et al. Cardiac involvement in Fabry disease: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(7):922–936. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024
A family with suspected inherited HCM is referred to the inherited cardiac conditions clinic. According to the 2023 ESC cardiomyopathy guideline, when is genetic counselling recommended?
Explanation
Genetic counselling by an appropriately trained professional, including genetic education and psychosocial support, is a Class I recommendation for families with an inherited or suspected inherited cardiomyopathy regardless of whether testing is planned. Counselling is a process of helping families understand and adapt to the medical, psychosocial and familial impact of a genetic condition; it includes a three-generation family history, discussion of inheritance and the need for clinical evaluation, and pre- and post-test sessions when testing does go ahead.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Charron P, et al. Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(22):2715–2726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq271
A 38-year-old with familial DCM is about to have panel testing. Which statement about pre-test genetic counselling is correct?
Explanation
The ESC 2023 guideline lists the key pre-test discussion points: a detailed family history, genetic education, the process and logistics of testing, all possible outcomes, implications for clinical care, lifestyle and employment, implications for the family, the risk of reclassification, secondary genetic findings, potential insurance implications (country dependent), and psychosocial support. Pre- and post-test counselling is a Class I recommendation for every person undergoing cardiomyopathy genetic testing, irrespective of panel size, prior counselling of relatives, or the eventual result. The JCGM 2019 guidance makes the same points for UK practice: consent discussions should cover familial implications, the possibility of unexpected findings and that interpretation may be updated later.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A 62-year-old with definite ACM has no living relatives and no children. He asks for genetic testing 'because I want to know'. According to the 2023 ESC guideline, what is the position?
Explanation
The Class I indication for testing a proband depends on it enabling diagnosis, prognostication, therapeutic stratification, reproductive management, or cascade evaluation of relatives. Where none of these applies, the guideline still allows testing to be considered (Class IIb, Level C) when it will have a net benefit to the patient, taking into account the psychological impact and the patient's own preference. The right to know is respected, but the decision should follow counselling rather than an automatic order.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
A 34-year-old dies suddenly and the post-mortem shows hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Relatives ask whether the deceased can be genetically tested. What does the 2023 ESC guideline say?
Explanation
Genetic testing of a deceased individual found to have a cardiomyopathy at post-mortem is a Class I (Level C) recommendation when a genetic diagnosis would facilitate management of surviving relatives. In England this is delivered through the National Genomic Test Directory on the matching condition panel (R131 for HCM), which explicitly includes deceased individuals with pathologically confirmed HCM. Consent for using stored tissue is governed by the Human Tissue Act 2004 and comes from the nominated representative or a person in a qualifying relationship, not from the deceased.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; NHS England. National Genomic Test Directory for rare and inherited disease, version 9 (2026/27). england.nhs.uk/publication/national-genomic-test-directories/
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Ethics & lawadvanced
A man died of dilated cardiomyopathy and the coroner's investigation is complete. Stored tissue could be tested for a familial variant. His wife declines consent but his adult sister wants the test. Under the Human Tissue Act 2004, whose decision governs?
Explanation
Where a deceased person made no decision in life and appointed no nominated representative, consent comes from the person in the highest-ranking qualifying relationship listed in section 27(4): spouse, civil partner or partner; then parent or child; then brother or sister; then grandparent or grandchild; then niece or nephew; then step-parent; then half-sibling; then friend of long standing. The wife therefore decides. A relative who cannot be contacted or does not wish to decide is passed over, but a relative who actively declines is not. The Act covers England, Wales and Northern Ireland; Scotland has its own Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006. The clinical value to the sister does not change the legal position, though counselling should explore why consent is being withheld.
ReferenceHuman Tissue Act 2004 (c.30), section 27 (qualifying relationships), section 45 and Schedule 4 (non-consensual analysis of DNA; excepted purposes). legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Ethics & lawadvanced
A clinician wants the laboratory to test a stored blood sample, taken from a living relative for an unrelated reason, for the family's KCNH2 variant without that relative's knowledge, to clarify a patient's risk. How does the Human Tissue Act 2004 apply?
Explanation
Section 45 makes it an offence to hold bodily material intending to analyse its DNA without qualifying consent, unless the analysis is for an excepted purpose. The excepted purposes in Schedule 4 include medical diagnosis or treatment of the person whose body manufactured the DNA, coroners' functions, crime prevention and court orders; they do not extend to diagnosing or managing a different person such as a relative. Testing a living relative's sample to inform someone else's care therefore needs that relative's consent, and the JCGM recommends that the routine use of stored family samples for quality assurance and relatives' testing is discussed at the time of the original test.
ReferenceHuman Tissue Act 2004 (c.30), section 27 (qualifying relationships), section 45 and Schedule 4 (non-consensual analysis of DNA; excepted purposes). legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A father with a pathogenic RYR2 variant and CPVT asks whether his 2-year-old daughter should have predictive testing now. What does the 2022 EHRA/HRS/APHRS/LAHRS consensus advise?
Explanation
For CPVT and long QT syndrome, the consensus recommends predictive testing of at-risk children from birth onward, because life-threatening events can occur in early childhood and effective preventive treatment (beta-blockade and lifestyle advice) exists. This is the key distinction from HCM, DCM and ACM, where testing is generally recommended from 10–12 years and considered earlier only with early-onset disease in the family. The JCGM principle is the same: testing a child is justified when the result changes the child's own care during childhood.
ReferenceWilde AAM, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases. Europace. 2022;24(8):1307–1367. doi:10.1093/europace/euac030; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A mother with HCM and a pathogenic MYBPC3 variant asks about testing her 6-year-old son. No relative developed disease before adulthood. What is the recommended approach?
Explanation
The ESC 2023 guideline gives cascade testing in paediatric relatives a Class IIa recommendation, to be considered in the light of the underlying cardiomyopathy, the expected age of onset, how the disease has presented in the family, and the clinical and legal consequences of testing a child. The 2022 EHRA consensus recommends predictive testing in HCM from over 10–12 years, and earlier where there is a family history of early-onset disease. ESC Table 12 lists the issues specific to children: autonomy, consent appropriate to understanding, the right to know or not to know, incomplete and age-related penetrance, school and employment, and transition to adult services. There is no UK legal age bar; the decision is a best-interests one made with the family.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Wilde AAM, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases. Europace. 2022;24(8):1307–1367. doi:10.1093/europace/euac030
Marfan SyndromeConsent & capacityintermediate
A 15-year-old asks for cascade testing for the familial FBN1 variant and clearly understands the implications. Under UK practice described by the JCGM, what applies to consent?
Explanation
Those under 16 are presumed not to have capacity, but an adolescent may be assessed as competent to decide for themselves (Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986]) and can then give valid consent. Young people aged 16 or 17 are presumed to have capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Where a child lacks competence, consent comes from a person with parental responsibility, acting in the child's best interests. In Marfan syndrome a positive result changes childhood care (aortic surveillance and beta-blockade), so testing in childhood is appropriate.
ReferenceRoyal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; Mental Capacity Act 2005 (c.9), sections 1–4 (principles, capacity, best interests). legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9
A 45-year-old with hereditary ATTR amyloidosis due to TTR V122I requests predictive testing of his healthy 8-year-old daughter. What does UK guidance on testing children advise?
Explanation
The JCGM 2019 guidance, building on the 2010 British Society for Human Genetics report on testing children, advises that predictive testing for conditions that will only be relevant in adulthood should generally be deferred until the young person can make their own decision, unless an intervention in childhood would change the course of the disease. The child's best interests are the primary justification; benefit to a parent is not. Hereditary ATTR amyloidosis has an onset decades away and no childhood intervention. Parents' requests are best reframed as a discussion about the optimal time to test rather than a refusal.
ReferenceRoyal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
A 44-year-old woman with DCM and a severe learning disability lacks capacity to decide about genetic testing. Her sister wants predictive testing, which requires the familial variant to be identified first. Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, what is the position?
Explanation
An adult lacking capacity may have a test carried out if it is in their best interests under section 4, which requires consideration of their past and present wishes, beliefs and values and consultation with carers and others interested in their welfare. Best interests are not confined to clinical benefit; the JCGM (Case 7, a woman with DCM in exactly this situation) notes there is legal precedent for treating testing whose main aim is to help relatives as capable of being in the person's best interests, provided discomfort and distress are weighed, and recommends multidisciplinary discussion. Next of kin have no legal authority to consent for an adult; only a health and welfare attorney or a court-appointed deputy can, and even they must act in best interests.
ReferenceMental Capacity Act 2005 (c.9), sections 1–4 (principles, capacity, best interests). legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A 30-year-old with Brugada syndrome and a mild learning disability declines genetic testing after discussion. His mother says he 'doesn't really understand'. Which Mental Capacity Act 2005 principle applies first?
Explanation
The first statutory principle is the presumption of capacity. The others are that all practicable steps must be taken to help the person decide, that an unwise decision does not of itself show incapacity, that anything done for a person who lacks capacity must be in their best interests, and that the least restrictive option should be preferred. Capacity is decision-specific and time-specific: the test is whether an impairment of the mind or brain leaves him unable to understand, retain, use or weigh the relevant information, or communicate the decision. A diagnosis of learning disability does not decide the matter, and a parent cannot consent for an adult.
ReferenceMental Capacity Act 2005 (c.9), sections 1–4 (principles, capacity, best interests). legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)Confidentialityadvanced
A woman with LQT2 and a pathogenic KCNH2 variant refuses to allow her estranged brother, who has two young children, to be told about the familial risk. What do GMC and JCGM guidance permit?
Explanation
GMC guidance recognises that genetic information about one patient may be relevant to relatives. If the patient refuses to share it, the doctor must balance the duty to make the patient's care their first concern against the duty to help protect others from serious harm; disclosure without consent can be justified where failure to disclose may expose others to a risk of death or serious harm. Unusually, the GMC adds that where practicable the patient's identity should not be disclosed when contacting and advising others about the risks they face. The JCGM frames the familial variant as information confidential to the family rather than to the individual, so the brother can be alerted that the family carries a treatable arrhythmia risk without his sister's clinical details being shared.
ReferenceGeneral Medical Council. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. London: GMC; 2017, paragraphs 63–70 and 73–76 (genetic and other shared information). gmc-uk.org; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A proband with HCM and a pathogenic MYH7 variant refuses consent for her at-risk relatives to be informed. Before any breach of confidence, what does the JCGM 2019 guidance say the clinician should generally do?
Explanation
The JCGM sets out a sequence: consider whether a breach is necessary at all, since relatives can often be told of a familial risk without revealing in whom the variant was found; if a breach is necessary, attempt to obtain consent, discuss the case with experienced colleagues (for example a clinical ethics committee or the Genethics forum), tell the patient that you intend to disclose and why, contact the relative where practical, keep the disclosure to the minimum needed to communicate risk, and record the balancing carried out and the justification. NHS tracing can identify a relative's GP so that disclosure is mediated by someone the relative knows.
ReferenceRoyal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; General Medical Council. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. London: GMC; 2017, paragraphs 63–70 and 73–76 (genetic and other shared information). gmc-uk.org
A 28-year-old is referred because her cousin has ACM. The cousin was tested in your service and carries a pathogenic PKP2 variant, but has not been asked about sharing it. According to the JCGM 2019 guidance, can the variant be used to test the 28-year-old?
Explanation
The JCGM regards a disease-causing variant in a family as information confidential to the family rather than to the person in whom it was first found. The molecular details can therefore be shared with the laboratory testing a relative, while the cousin's personal clinical information (her diagnosis, symptoms and results) remains confidential to her. Where a patient has told relatives about a familial risk and a relative then presents, this itself suggests permission, and demanding further verification of consent is usually unnecessary. Good practice is to discuss and document at the original consent that the result may be used for relatives, so that the question does not arise later.
ReferenceRoyal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; General Medical Council. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. London: GMC; 2017, paragraphs 63–70 and 73–76 (genetic and other shared information). gmc-uk.org
Fabry DiseaseEthics & lawadvanced
A man with Fabry disease refuses to inform his adult daughters, who are obligate heterozygotes for his GLA variant. Which statement best describes the legal position after ABC v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2020]?
Explanation
In ABC, the daughter of a man with Huntington's disease sued after she was not told of her risk in time to make her own reproductive decisions. The High Court held that the clinicians owed her a duty of care to balance her interest in being informed against her father's confidentiality, because geneticists routinely acquire reliable information of clinical significance about their patients' relatives. On the facts the balance struck was reasonable, so the duty was not breached and causation was not established. The case does not create a duty to disclose in every situation; it requires the balancing to be carried out and documented, which is exactly what GMC and JCGM guidance already ask for. Every daughter of a man with Fabry disease inherits the variant, so the risk here is certain rather than probabilistic.
ReferenceABC v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust and others [2020] EWHC 455 (QB); Court of Appeal [2017] EWCA Civ 336; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; General Medical Council. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. London: GMC; 2017, paragraphs 63–70 and 73–76 (genetic and other shared information). gmc-uk.org
Short QT Syndrome (SQTS)Insuranceintermediate
A 25-year-old asymptomatic relative is considering predictive testing for the familial KCNH2 short QT variant and asks how a positive result would affect life insurance. What does the ABI/Government Code on Genetic Testing and Insurance provide?
Explanation
Under the Code, insurers will not require or pressure anyone to take a genetic test, and will only ask for a predictive result for conditions approved under the Code and above the financial limits (life £500,000; critical illness £300,000; income protection £30,000 a year). The only approved test is a predictive test for Huntington's disease in life insurance applications over £500,000, so a predictive channelopathy result need not be disclosed. The Code is a voluntary agreement that is a condition of ABI membership, is open-ended and reviewed every three years. Family history can still be asked about and taken into account.
ReferenceHM Government and Association of British Insurers. Code on Genetic Testing and Insurance: a voluntary code of practice. London; October 2018 (three-yearly reviews 2022 and 2025; wording updated March 2026). gov.uk/government/publications/code-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A man with clinically diagnosed HCM, confirmed by a diagnostic genetic test showing a pathogenic MYBPC3 variant, applies for life insurance. Under the ABI/Government Code, what must he disclose?
Explanation
The Code protects predictive genetic tests in people without symptoms. It expressly does not cover diagnostic genetic tests, which confirm or exclude a diagnosis in someone with symptoms, signs or abnormal investigations; those results form part of the medical information an insurer may ask about, in the same way as an echocardiogram. Applicants must take reasonable care not to misrepresent their health under the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012. The £500,000 threshold relates only to predictive Huntington's disease tests. Counselling before testing should therefore distinguish clearly between a diagnostic test in an affected person and a predictive test in a healthy relative.
ReferenceHM Government and Association of British Insurers. Code on Genetic Testing and Insurance: a voluntary code of practice. London; October 2018 (three-yearly reviews 2022 and 2025; wording updated March 2026). gov.uk/government/publications/code-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM)Insuranceintermediate
A woman's father tested positive for a familial LMNA variant. She has not been tested and applies for critical illness cover. Under the ABI/Government Code, what may the insurer ask?
Explanation
Commitment 3 of the Code states that insurers will not ask an applicant to disclose the result of a predictive genetic test of another person, such as a blood relative, nor a result obtained exclusively in research, nor one taken after the policy started. Insurers remain lawfully entitled to ask about family medical history and may price on it. If an applicant volunteers a favourable predictive result, for example a negative test that rules out a risk suggested by the family history, the insurer may use it to offer better terms, but an unfavourable result volunteered by mistake is ignored unless the Huntington's disease exception applies.
ReferenceHM Government and Association of British Insurers. Code on Genetic Testing and Insurance: a voluntary code of practice. London; October 2018 (three-yearly reviews 2022 and 2025; wording updated March 2026). gov.uk/government/publications/code-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS)NHS pathwaysfoundation
Which document specifies the genomic tests commissioned by the NHS in England, and which organisation did it replace in 2018?
Explanation
From 2001 to 2018 the UK Genetic Testing Network (UKGTN) evaluated and advised on NHS genetic tests. From October 2018 the National Genomic Test Directory, the central feature of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service, took over and now lists every commissioned test with its eligibility criteria, the genes covered and the testing method. The rare and inherited disease directory is reviewed regularly (version 9 covers 2026/27). Inherited cardiac condition indications carry R codes: R127 long QT syndrome, R128 Brugada syndrome, R129 CPVT, R130 short QT syndrome, R131 HCM, R132 DCM and ACM, R133 ACM/ARVC, and R138 for sudden death with a normal post-mortem or idiopathic VF.
ReferenceNHS England. The National Genomic Test Directory (superseded the UK Genetic Testing Network, UKGTN, from October 2018). england.nhs.uk/genomics/the-national-genomic-test-directory/; NHS England. National Genomic Test Directory for rare and inherited disease, version 9 (2026/27). england.nhs.uk/publication/national-genomic-test-directories/
Brugada Syndrome (BrS)NHS pathwaysfoundation
A cardiologist wants to request Brugada syndrome genetic testing for a patient with a spontaneous Type 1 pattern. How is testing delivered and requested under the National Genomic Test Directory?
Explanation
The NHS Genomic Medicine Service consolidates NHS genomic testing into a single national network of seven Genomic Laboratory Hubs working to common standards. Each directory indication has an R code with eligibility criteria and named requesting specialties; for Brugada syndrome (R128, a 13-gene panel) these are cardiology and clinical genetics. The directory expects all inherited cardiac condition tests to be performed alongside expert phenotypic assessment in an inherited cardiac conditions clinic, with clinical genetics support, and only where the result is likely to change management for the proband or family.
ReferenceNHS England. National Genomic Test Directory for rare and inherited disease, version 9 (2026/27). england.nhs.uk/publication/national-genomic-test-directories/; Wilde AAM, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases. Europace. 2022;24(8):1307–1367. doi:10.1093/europace/euac030
A 24-year-old dies suddenly during a run; post-mortem examination and toxicology are normal. What genetic approach do the 2022 EHRA consensus and the UK test directory support?
Explanation
When a sudden death remains unexplained after autopsy and toxicology, the consensus advises post-mortem genetic testing targeted to channelopathy genes where the circumstances or family history suggest a primary electrical disease; hypothesis-free exome or genome sequencing should not be performed in a decedent or an unexplained cardiac arrest survivor. In England this is the R138 indication (sudden death with a normal post-mortem under 40, or under 60 with a relevant family history), delivered on an inherited cardiac conditions panel using blood or tissue retained at autopsy. Exertional death in a young person raises CPVT and long QT syndrome in particular. Relatives are offered clinical evaluation in parallel, and a pathogenic result then allows targeted cascade testing.
ReferenceWilde AAM, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases. Europace. 2022;24(8):1307–1367. doi:10.1093/europace/euac030; NHS England. National Genomic Test Directory for rare and inherited disease, version 9 (2026/27). england.nhs.uk/publication/national-genomic-test-directories/
The coroner retained tissue blocks from a 29-year-old whose post-mortem showed ARVC. After the inquest closes, the family asks for genetic testing of the tissue. What consent is required?
Explanation
A coroner's post-mortem and the retention of material for the coroner's purposes do not need consent. Once those purposes are complete, however, continued storage or use of the tissue for a scheduled purpose such as genetic testing requires appropriate consent under the Human Tissue Act 2004: from a decision the person made in life, from their nominated representative, or from someone in a qualifying relationship in the section 27(4) order. The Human Tissue Authority notes that continued retention may be in the clinical interests of relatives when a genetic condition is suspected, so the options should be raised with the family before the retention period expires. The ESC gives testing of a deceased person with cardiomyopathy at post-mortem a Class I recommendation when it would help surviving relatives.
ReferenceHuman Tissue Authority. Consent for post-mortem examination and tissue retention under the Human Tissue Act 2004 (coroners' post-mortem guidance). hta.gov.uk; Human Tissue Act 2004 (c.30), section 27 (qualifying relationships), section 45 and Schedule 4 (non-consensual analysis of DNA; excepted purposes). legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Fabry DiseaseGenetic testingintermediate
Exome sequencing for a non-cardiac indication reports a pathogenic GLA variant as a secondary finding in a 40-year-old man with no cardiac symptoms. How should this be handled?
Explanation
A secondary or incidental finding is an actionable result unrelated to the reason for testing and should be handled through the clinical genetics pathway with counselling and clinical assessment, not simply appended to the original report. The JCGM advises that consent for genomic testing should cover the possibility of unexpected findings and how they will be dealt with. The ESC 2023 guideline notes that the American College of Medical Genetics recommends evaluating cardiomyopathy genes for secondary findings whenever broad clinical sequencing is undertaken, but that there is no international consensus and that opportunistic screening of cardiac genes should currently be confined to research. Fabry disease is X-linked, so a confirmed finding has implications for his daughters, mother and sisters; that conversation belongs with him, not directly with relatives.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; Wilde AAM, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases. Europace. 2022;24(8):1307–1367. doi:10.1093/europace/euac030
Cascade testing in a family with late-onset Pompe disease identifies a heterozygous GAA carrier. What does the 2023 ESC guideline advise about cardiac surveillance and counselling for this person?
Explanation
Pompe disease is autosomal recessive. The ESC 2023 guideline states that when inheritance is clearly other than autosomal dominant, evaluation of relatives should be individualised, and that heterozygous carriers of a clearly recessive cardiomyopathy could be discharged from periodic surveillance. Carriers do not develop the disease, so preventive enzyme replacement has no place. Counselling remains important: a carrier's children are at risk only if the other parent is also a carrier, so partner carrier testing and, where relevant, reproductive options should be discussed with a genetics professional.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A man with a pathogenic FBN1 variant and his partner are planning a family and ask what can be offered. What do the 2023 ESC guideline and UK practice say?
Explanation
The ESC gives a Class IIa recommendation to discussing reproductive genetic testing options with all families who have a genetic diagnosis, and a Class I recommendation that counselling on the risk of inheritance is offered to all men and women before conception. Options include preimplantation genetic testing for a monogenic disorder (PGT-M) after IVF, which in the UK is regulated by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and licensed for conditions with high penetrance and significant morbidity, and prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus sampling from 10–14 weeks or amniocentesis after 15 weeks. If prenatal testing is chosen it should be done early enough in the pregnancy to allow decisions about continuation or planning of delivery (Class I). Counselling must be non-directive; nothing is required.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019
A TTN variant reported as a VUS in 2020 is upgraded to likely pathogenic in 2026 after new segregation data. What should happen now?
Explanation
Interpretation of a genetic result can change in either direction as evidence accumulates, so the ESC 2023 guideline states that systematic reclassification and communication back to families is crucial, and the 2024 AHA/ACC HCM guideline makes serial re-evaluation of variant significance a Class 1 recommendation. An upgrade to likely pathogenic enables targeted cascade testing that was previously impossible and can reopen a family. The JCGM advises that consent conversations should explain that interpretation may be updated and that the patient may be recontacted, while not promising automatic recontact unless the service has a reliable mechanism; patients with uncertain findings should be encouraged to seek an updated interpretation periodically.
ReferenceArbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Genetic Medicine. Consent and confidentiality in genomic medicine: guidance on the use of genetic and genomic information in the clinic. 3rd ed. Report of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine. London: RCP, RCPath and BSGM; 2019; Ommen SR, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2024;149(23):e1239–e1311. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250
A 52-year-old man of Black African ancestry brings a direct-to-consumer genetic report stating that he carries TTR V122I. He has no symptoms. What is the appropriate next step?
Explanation
The 2022 EHRA consensus notes that several companies offer direct-to-consumer sequencing that includes inherited cardiac genes in people without symptoms, and that the benefits and harms of this have not been established. A consumer result is a prompt for referral, not a diagnosis: the ESC 2023 guideline requires that genetic testing is performed with access to a multidisciplinary team with expertise in variant interpretation (Class I), and cascade testing depends on a confirmed pathogenic variant that fits the clinical context. Confirmation in an NHS Genomic Laboratory Hub, pre- and post-test counselling, and assessment for cardiac amyloidosis come first; disease-modifying therapy is for established amyloid cardiomyopathy, not for carriers.
ReferenceWilde AAM, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases. Europace. 2022;24(8):1307–1367. doi:10.1093/europace/euac030; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; NHS England. National Genomic Test Directory for rare and inherited disease, version 9 (2026/27). england.nhs.uk/publication/national-genomic-test-directories/
A man with Danon disease and a pathogenic LAMP2 variant asks about the risk to his future children. What should he be told?
Explanation
Danon disease is X-linked. A man passes his X chromosome to every daughter and his Y chromosome to every son, so all daughters inherit the LAMP2 variant and no sons do. Because LAMP2 loss behaves as X-linked dominant, heterozygous daughters are at risk of cardiomyopathy, typically presenting later and less severely than males. A 50% risk to each child applies to autosomal dominant conditions, and 25% to autosomal recessive ones. Counselling on the risk of inheritance before starting a family is a Class I recommendation in the ESC cardiomyopathy guideline.
ReferenceBrambatti M, et al. Danon disease: gender differences in presentation and outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.020; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194
Before any genetic test is requested in a newly diagnosed patient with HCM, which step is a Class 1 part of the initial assessment in the 2024 AHA/ACC guideline?
Explanation
Evaluation of familial inheritance with a three-generation family history is a Class 1 recommendation, and the 2023 ESC guideline lists obtaining a three-generation pedigree among the core tasks of genetic counselling. The pedigree identifies the most clearly affected person to test first, shows whether disease is familial, and defines which relatives are at risk whatever the genetic result. Sudden deaths, unexplained drownings and road accidents, and diagnoses in relatives should be asked about explicitly. Testing begins with the proband; broad testing of unaffected relatives before the proband is avoided.
ReferenceOmmen SR, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2024;149(23):e1239–e1311. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250; Arbelo E, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3503–3626. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194; Musunuru K, et al. Genetic testing for inherited cardiovascular diseases: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020;13(4):e000067. doi:10.1161/HCG.0000000000000067